(tongue in cheek)
In his book the Attention Economy, Tom Davenport discusses how attention is the scarecest organizational / individual resource, and how difficult it is to attract it.
I think the folks at Air New Zealand have found the solution.
Friday, July 31, 2009
Monday, July 27, 2009
Stumbled across an interesting story on CBC News about The Living Library - "an innovative method designed to promote dialogue, reduce prejudices and encourage understanding." - where people can check out "living books" (other people) that are representative of and have experienced specific stereotyping / common prejudices. A great concept / approach, and I wonder if it can be implemented inside an organization. It does have much in common with mentoring, but I can also see it as a possible extension of Library services - connecting the right people with each other about a topic. (Though maybe I'm being seduced somewhat by what the above initiative is titled.)
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
In The Crowd Is Wise (When It’s Focused), a NY Times article by Steve Lohr, the author makes a pretty good point: "Evidence suggests that crowdsourcing succeeds when it’s designed for specific tasks — and when the incentives attract the most effective collaborators."
Would indicate to me that even in the brave new world of Enterprise 2.0, some form of facilitator is required ensure that great ideas are generated, and that the right ideas are acted upon to yield meaningful results, all within a resontable timeframe.
(Thanks to Peter Z at Cognitive Potential for pointing me to the article.)
Monday, July 13, 2009
Jen Hunter over at Learning Catalyst recently made reference to Ideaconnection.com, a very interesting online market connecting people with ideas to people with challenges. It is a very interesting site, with contests, shared collaborative spaces, access to experts, related markets for technolgy licenses, and a whole lot more. A very well thought out space, with some interesting potential inside organizations.
Sunday, July 05, 2009
Nick Bontis and Alexander Serenko have recently authored A follow-up ranking of academic journals that identifies Journal of Knowledge Management as the top ranked knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journal. This is a follow- up to their earlier Global ranking of knowledge management
and intellectual capital academic journals.
Posted by Dale Arseneault at 6:58 PM
Friday, July 03, 2009
I was just reading Leon Benjamin's KnowledgeBoard article titled Social media on the inside in which he writes about the transformative nature of social media platforms, the value of "flat" communities and networks as structures for building and maintaining intangible assets and getting work done, and the conflicts between these and traditional management approaches - a good, pithy article.
One phrase in Leon's article jumped out at me - "markets are conversations."
In 2002 I was fortunate to have had a number of great conversations about knowledge management with Leigh Weiss and Tim Shavers from McKinsey. Many of the conversations revolved around the concept and applicability of a market model for knowledge. This concept was succinctly described in Making a Market in Knowledge written by Lowell Bryan, McKinsey Quarterly 2004.
In a preamble to describing the concept, Bryan explores a number of "KM" approaches that have failed to generate the required returns, including:
- big investments in document-management systems, shared servers, and other technology solutions that most often result in large volumes of outdated documents, making it difficult for users to locate the best few "just in time" relevant, quality and timely documents
- "push" strategies where centralized staff provide knowledge to users that does not meet user needs
- letting organizational units solve their own knowledge problems, which often results in knowledge silos and solutions that are non-scalable across the organization
Critical, though is the need to build a true learning and collaboration culture, else these markets / platforms will remain underutilized.. Many knowledge and information initiatives I've heard about focus on enabling the knowledge / information owner capturing and making their "stuff" available, or pushing it on overworked knowledge workers. The focus needs to be more on the learner / consumer. (Nancy Dixon wrote a great article titled The Neglected Receiver of Knowledge Sharing a while back - one of the few on the topic.)
We all learn before doing (from information content, friends, colleagues, experts etc.) as part of doing knowledge work, and as a result, often create new / improved /evolved knowledge and information. We need to remove the many organizational and social barriers to learning and knowledge seeking, recognize and reinforce these forms of behaviour in ourselves and our colleagues, and create a demand for knowledge and information in all its forms.
That demand, the learning needs, will create the context and the markets that are critically important for learning from and benefiting from the experiences of others. Learning is evidenced in changes in thinking and behaviour. And the change comes from the learner (demand side of the market) not the knowledge / information transmitter (supply side).
Nurturing the evolution of this type of learning and collaboration culture is not an easy task, given the power of the human ego - "I'm different".. "my agenda above all else".. "I can do it better".. "I'm afraid to let others know I don't know something" - or the time pressures we're all under - "it's too hard to find what/ who I'm looking for.. so I'll just recreate it.." Nonetheless, a culture that values experential and serendipitous learning is a critical success factor for knowledge markets and platforms.
I'm beginning to think that the evolution of knowledge management thinking, the growing promise and potential of emerging social technologies, demographic shifts in organizations, behaviours of newer generations of techno-savy employees, and the growing acknowledgement of the need to systematically go about connecting people to each other and to information, may be creating a more generalized readiness for "knowledge markets" of the type McKinsey was writing about earlier in this decade.
As I mentioned above, Leon writes "markets are conversations." I'd like to flip that and say "conversations are markets." Thinking back many of my conversations, they are often highly dynamic markets where knowledge and information are exchanged in a complex web of interactions across multiple communications channels, with each participant assessing value of the exchange based on their own criteria.
Imagine elevating the level of conversation at an organizational level.